A TEXT POST

Just to clarify:

kriegspeil:

There is a difference between basing an entire character’s personality or arc on their sexuality, and not acknowledging it at all.

Both are problematic. And you don’t have to do one in order to not do the other. Because there appears to be some confusing surrounding this.

Saying “It’s problematic that we see nothing of River’s bisexuality on screen” is not the same as saying “I want an arc that entirely revolves around River’s sexuality”

Saying “I wan’t River’s bisexuality acknowledged” does not mean “Hey, let’s put a bunch of sex scenes in a kid’s show”. Because I think we’ve all agreed that bisexual people have more to their identity than who they’re sleeping with.

 Seriously? River is bi? Okay, the fact that someone who has seen all her episodes more than once can not know that is a problem.

C’mon, people - we don’t need another Captain Jack to have a queer character acknowledged in this show.

Reblogged from #1 Lwaxana fan blog
  1. joanwatsn reblogged this from stfu-moffat
  2. bisexualftw reblogged this from howllor
  3. thursdaysoldier reblogged this from themostfeminist
  4. feministkoala reblogged this from themostfeminist
  5. forgottendance reblogged this from aceofblueheart
  6. daughterofwinterhell reblogged this from andimprouvaire
  7. andimprouvaire reblogged this from goldenheartedrose
  8. vicar-with-a-bleeding-face reblogged this from stfu-moffat
  9. stellarer reblogged this from goldenheartedrose
  10. goldenheartedrose reblogged this from librarianknight
  11. mad-man-with-a-scarf reblogged this from librarianknight
  12. librarianknight reblogged this from themostfeminist
  13. themostfeminist reblogged this from stfu-moffat
  14. becauseheswill reblogged this from stfu-moffat
  15. girlsinkhearts reblogged this from stfu-moffat
  16. writeanotherballad reblogged this from stfu-moffat
  17. stfu-moffat reblogged this from howllor
  18. djmyrstack reblogged this from howllor
  19. keenquing reblogged this from big-bad-little-red